Opening Statement for State V. John Hudson and Dale Buckner

Case 1 State v. John Hudson and Dale Buckner (Charged with rack up and attempted robbery) devout Afternoon Ladies and GentlemanTodays trial volition be on Felony capital punish custodyt and Attempted robbery. John Hudson and Dale Buckner be murderers. And the evidence of this case result show, that they acquire undoubtedly fi allowed the hatreds brought upon them and should be punished to the fullest extent of the law.In accordance to the penal Law, Murder in the first gear degree is defined With figure to make up the death of another person, he causes the death of much(prenominal) person the victim was killed while the suspect was in the course of pluckting / attempting to commit in publicity of robbery or other such felonies. 125. 27(1)(a)(vii) This is also kn aver as Felony Murder. Robbery is also defined as forcible stealing. On February 14th 2011 in a small clothing store owned and managed by Sidney and Sara leper, a very heinous crime was committed.Two avera ge looking men wearing away colour leather jackets entered the store at approximately 315 pm, later to be proven to be John Hudson and Dale Buckner. When approaching the call with a . 38 revolver in hand, the defendant demanded all of the capital from the register. As the other man stood point at the entrance to the store. Mrs. lazar let out a scream, produced from shear fear for her life. In doing so, Dale Bruckner responded chuck out her up Johnny which resulted in Mrs. leper being brutally breeze in the head, dreadfully causing death on impact.Soon after the crampfish went off, the 2 men fled the store and took off in a black Cadillac sedan. This left a deceased woman and her innocent husband at the perspective of the crime in a pool of blood. Five proceedings later Officer Reilly arrived on the scene and accessed the situation. With diligent research and a thorough investigation, the arrest of the defendants was reinforced by the owner ship of a . 38 caliber pistol, a newly registered black Cadillac pub as well as a previous miserable record from twain of the defendants. I will call the prosecutions witness Mr.Sidney Lazar to the witness stand to divulge the utter gruesome details of how his married woman was shot in cold blood, in front of his very own eyes. I will also call to evidence the prosecutions witness and innocent bystander Richard Green to the witness stand. He will economic aid us positively identify the defendants, and reinforce that the defendants did in circumstance commit the crimes charged, as he was the only eye witness that saw the defendants present the scene of the crime. These two men witnessed the crime take place and are testifying that the two defendants did in fact kill Mrs.Lazar. Investigator Sam Reilly will also be called to testify, in that he was the first investigator on the scene. Shortly after the murder, Officer Reilly went to the defendants home at 2435 Damen Street, apt 2B and forced down Mr. John Hudso ns and Dale Buckners door. While at the apartment, Officer Reilly Recovered a . 38 revolver (matching the gun from the crime scene), a black leather jacket, and a newly registered Black Cadillac Sedan which matched the description of the getaway car.Due to officer Reillys work, pertinent details of the defendants background and belongings have been brought to trial and will inspection and repair us prove that the defendants did, beyond a reasonable doubt murder, and instigate in murdering Mrs. Sara Lazar. Upon arrest, the defendants both refused to make a recital concerning the killing of Mrs. Lazar. Ladies and Gentleman, the defense John Hudson and Dale Buckner claim that they were not at the scene of the crime on the fourteenth of February at approximately 315 pm.Conveniently two months after the incident, William Barr was interviewed by Investigator Albert LaRue and swore that he saw the defendants at Sams Chicken Shack at about 315 on the day of the murder. He failed to menti on this until two months later. His affliction to be expeditious about his alibi just proves his minute companionship to the defendants. Although Mr. Barr might not have a previous criminal record, he is blinded to the lack of moral aptitude held by the defendants hither today. In addition to Mr.Barrs testimony, a Pathologist will testify and will function us better understand the cause of death, of Mrs. Lazar. As well as a ballistic expert, will attest to the fellowship of the weapon used in this murder case and will help us verify that the . 38 caliber pistol was in fact the murder weapon of this case. In the course of this trial I will demonstrate that these two defendants did in fact commit the crime of murder and attempted robbery. The lack of morality expressed by the defendants actions will assist us in concluding with a finding of fact of guilty for these two men.I expect to prove that without a doubt these two men are in fact murderers. Those who perform such crimes wi th intent to kill someone, men of distaste, and men of disgust, men who lack a conscience, and whoremaster kill an innocent woman deliberately with no remorse. Once again, these men are dangerous we must prove today that the evidence brought upon us will show in its entirety that John Hudson and Dale Buckner committed the crimes beforehand them. These two men must face ramifications and should go to jail forever. Mr. Hudsons previous opinion of aggravated assault and Mr.Buckners previous conviction of theft go hand in hand. Their previous crimes make a perfect match for the situation imminent. They will be punished and Mrs. Lazars death will not go overlooked. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury let me ask you, would you be able to sleep at night cognize that these two men are on the streets, and have the ability to commit such a crime once more? Would you feel effective having your kids walk to the ice cream store knowing that these killers could possibly be around the corner ju st waiting for their opportunity to strike again?These men must be taught a lesson now, so these streets can be kept safe for the ones we love. Definitions Robbery is forcible stealing. A person forcibly steals proportion and commits robbery when, in the course of committing a larceny, he uses or threatens the immediate use of physical force upon another person for the exercise of Preventing or overcoming resistance to the taking of the property or to the retention therefore immediately after the taking or Compelling the owner of such property or another person to deliver up the property or to engage in other conduct which aids in the commission of the larceny. Murder -A person is guilty of murder in the first degree when -With intent to cause the death of another person, he causes the death of such person or of a third person and -the victim was killed while the defendant was in the course of committing or attempting to commit and in furtherance of robbery, Homicide The deliber ate and unlawful killing of one person by another murder.