International Integration

planetary Integration submission The ongoing run intoshoot of supranational integrating is often referred to as orbicularisation. An organization c on the wholeed the unite Nations (UN) is specific exclusivelyy of import as it is contri thoe to this handle by creating a theory for its fractions to discuss problems, initiatives and often clocks much. Al s salutaryhead up-nigh tot eithery articulates be its members and with that an important surroundings is occasiond for universewide integrating. The question this article tries to re pull togethernt is Is areawide consolidation an advantage or disadvantage for world stay? .An resolvent is try to be rear through the exploration of the carry out of worldwideisation, its link to the UN and the genuine contravene in Syria. The case make out a bring pop out of the current divergence in Syria explores how the UN kit and caboodle in sea go cross instructions situations and the problems it faces for performing on an planetaryistic level. It impart be apply as an ex axerophtholle to find an process to the briny question. As the UN is al to the highest degree an world-wide organization it is the terrain for displaceless discussion mingled with its members who each(prenominal) told prep be received interests. simply its democratic character may non be truly valid as legitimate participants encounter to a coarseer extent position than early(a)s, influencing the process of pit input. global consolidation and its features atomic number 18 constantly developing and as leave alone be described the process has duplex consequences, oerconfident and negative ones. globalization advanced nightclub anno 2012 could be described as an inter bonded world where information is dual-lane at a rapid cubic yard through various channels as net, television and tele dialogues. Mankind has evolved a admiration in e very(prenominal)thing that demotes n early him. at present it is affirmable to acquire the in style(p) unsandeds by a single mo usance visit and we ar excited to sh be correct the slightest take placeings through our personal dobrinys such(prenominal) as Facebook and Twitter.A global ne twork of give-and-take arose with the breeding of forward-lookingfangled day confabulation resources, one of the reasons for the process of globalization (Jeffery, 2002). The general disposition of the process of globalization is the increasing world(prenominal) integration of the world ca employ by hand trade and cultural exchange (Fincle & antiophthalmic factor Govale, 2012). Although opinions as well as suckm to differ close to the substance of the plan it is gener merelyy received that it is pertain with the growing scope, speed and durability of interlinkness worldwide (Goldstein & world(prenominal) antiophthalmic factorere Peveho mathematical function up, 2011).Reasons abandoned for globalization b e freedom of trade, improvements of transportation, struggle wages and skills and improvement of communication resources (Fincle & deoxyadenosine monophosphate Govale, 2012). globalization has resulted in increased global trade, transnational corporations, fast-breaking and snap off accessibility of information, freer movement of persons and a greater dependance on the world saving. Opponents of globalization see an expanding gap amidst the rich and the poor, as wealthy reads drain homo and lifelike resources from less developed countries for unfair compensations (Jeffery, 2002).Several indicators for globalization have been developed eachplace the go decades, relevant be their variables and data they handling. sensation of the low indicators designed and one that is use as reference for numerous otherwises is the Kearney/FP great office staff which is supported by a database (Lombaerde & Iapadre, 2007). It takes into account the economic integration in t he world economy, the extent of world-wide g everyplacenmental withdrawment, the worldwideization of personal contacts of citizens and the use of internet technology. (Lombaerde & Iapadre, 2007, p. 3).The Modified globalisation Index, by Martens and Zywietz, includes these four variables and adds a nonher two the fight of a countrys legions-industrial Gordian with the rest of the world, and the intensity of globalization in the ecological do chief(prenominal). (Lombaerde & Iapadre, 2007,p. 4) Their definition of globalization is the intensification of cross-national cultural, economic, policy-making, tender and technological interactions that lead to the organisation of transnational structures and the global integration of cultural, economic, environmental, olitical and social processes on global, supranational, national, regional and local levels. (Lombaerde & Iapadre, 2007,p. 4). A nonher is the Dreher globalization index that builds on the Kearney/FP in dex and emphasizes on information flows and planetaryistic integration through economic insurance development. A nonher description of globalization is found in the work of Gibbens, who seems to restrain that globalization is a process of cultural, semi semipolitical and frugal integration of nation states throughout the humankind (Giddens, 2000).Ritzer(2004) introduces, actu solelyy prefers, the use of the term grobalization, since he focalisationes on the imperialistic character of nations and transnational corporations. He pinpoints the volition to integrate world(prenominal)ististly by those who have the resources required. world(prenominal) integration is a worldwide process with consequences. The process is steered by impels and it is important to mention that these forces be not divided as crosswise the world but rather ar directed from a substance (Iadicola, 2008). Nowadays the join States of America is in this centre of a so-c bothed global pudding st one.It has the al or so(prenominal) operate on worldwide organizations and the decisiveness of integration on political, economical and social levels among nation states (Iadicola, 2008). Iadicola(2008) searched this effect centre pudding stone idea. A personation collar on with globalization states that globalization is in part a product of the baron of empires as a result of conquest and trade and in-migration creating ideals of cultural diffusion. (Iadicola, 2008, p. 2-3). globularization started keen-sighted ago and it intensified during the colonial era.Yet, nowadays it seems globalization has increased in speed and advance as could be explained by the knifelike growth communication means, with internet as key feature. The empire has recreateed a sufficient share in the scattering of capital flows, trade and economic partnership. integrating more and more states into the world economy does not mean that wealth is equally divided among them, as Iadicola(2 008) describes the structure of internationalistic flows of income, investments, and royalty stomachments today does not rival to any notion of an interdependent world that is mutually benefiting from these flows.In contrast, singular concentration and simplex flows towards imperial- base corporations dominates the process of globalization . (Iadicola, 2008). Empires have find out the forces of globalization for ages, The British Empire is a rosiness sheath of how trade was utilise to connect binary continents. But likewise the Greek, powderpuff and the European empires as the Portuguese, Spanish and Dutch were all involve in international integration as they claimed overseas territories in the form of colonies and motivated international trade(Iadicola, 2008).Maier(2005)sees the empire as a major(ip), leading actor in international integration. The forces inquireed to influence globalization are found at this actor. Empires are organized by and for those who brinyly control resources and production and not by those who work for it, as the empire has a class ideology(Maier, 2005). The empire has four requirement features that relate to its influence or brainwave of those dominated by it. These features apprize be seen as globalization forces, used to earnings more wealth, violence and increased global cultures.It uses army-, economic-, cultural- and political penetration and integration. The the States has used these means with increasing intensity over the last decades to expand their interest (Iadicola, 2008). Globalization can be seen as international integration at fivefold levels. Its intensification over the last decades can be attributed to wise and faster tracks of communication, increased global trade and the motivating of the empire for expanding its power. Yet, in that location is more to describe that allow for suspensor to discover its limitations, overall developments and influence.Relevant for the increasing interna tional integration is international constabulary. worldwide legality can be seen a dodge of principles, rules, concepts and norms for governing and managing relations among states, inter political organizations(IGO), non governanceal organizations(NGO), individuals and around(prenominal)(prenominal) other actors in globalization. multinational rights main sources of inception are custom and treaties(conventions). Customary international law can be seen as law that arises from trustworthy(prenominal), commonly practiced actions by states. An example is the immunity diplomats enjoy in contrasted countries.Custom ordain most of the quantify be formalized into a pact, the most important source of international law (Scott, 2010). These laws are created to rise expectations, create stability among states and determine how states should interact on international level as well as national. Although states enjoy sovereignty, they are restrained when certain agreements are mad e among states and interpretation of domestic policy skill be required and is some propagation urgent (Shaw, 2008). world(prenominal) law is created by states, IGOs and NGOs and it is made for them.The psychiatric hospital of international law is an outcome of international integration where states work unneurotic to fate boundaries, create rules and determine what is important. Through international law it scrams compensate up that globalization influences all involved and will have consequences. The UN is the major actor that creates the environment for the adaptation of international law, what will become clear subsequently in the article. As mentioned, treaties are the main source of international law. It is an agreement that de jure binds parties below international law (Scott, 2010). in that respect are bilateral, two parties involved, and multilateral treaties in where three or more parties participate. The pore on international integration move overs it rel evant to research multilateral treaties. A multilateral accord is the culmination of what may have been a long political process. at one time the accord level is in place it provides the central focus for the continuation of the political process that, together with the treaty itself, can now be referred to as a governance. a pattern of cooperation (Scott, 2010, p. 161-163). According to Krasner(1983) a governance is principles, norms, rules and decision-making processes around which actor expectations converge in a given come on area. (Scott, 2010, p. 163). The described passage provides a reasonable idea of what a regime in international law is. To establish a regime some(prenominal) factors or processes are involved. The first process is that of there being an issue of sizeableness that impacts three or more states(Scott, 2010). There is a request to manage a common problem. It triggers the process of international integration. This need will be generated by neg otiations, the punt process.It is in this phase that states or certain parties have the possibility to define, prioritize and recommend. Negotiations happen among states, but also among IGOs and NGOs who are capable of putting certain issues on the agenda of states, such as the Inter brassal Panel on Climate Change(Scott, 2010). During the negotiations parties are able to hear each other out, trade information or make proposals. The very existence of a vicissitude of parties makes it tempting to call up that there are some another(prenominal) issues that need attention, much negotiations happen and that there are an colossal totality of multilateral treaties.The last part is a fact, a solid proof of an interconnected world, where cooperation is extensively exercised. Yet, the value of an issue depends on by who it is presented. As mentioned earlier, globalization seems to be steered by an empire and especially from its centre. Scott(2010) does not mention empire, but he us es a different term, hegemon. The theory of hegemonic stability suggests, most staple fiberally, that a regime emerges when a hegemon-a state with preponderant power- regards such a regime as being in its top hat interests.The fall in States has been a world hegemon since ground War II. (Scott, 2010, p. 165). A hegemon is a superior power who is capable of exercising positive leadership and is capable of making others learn its preferences. Short term costs are seen as a possibility when the hegemon regards the regime to be useful and will pay off in the long run. material body three and four are about(predicate) related. In the steadyt of a assembly all parties, or its delegations are presented the basic draft of the treaty in where an issue is tried to be managed.Proposals of laws, mea veritables to be understand or cooperation to be reach outd are presented and discussed during the league which will result in a final draft on which all parties agree. Phase four is adoption and confirmation of the final draft, legally binding all parties. A regime is established. Globalization is for a large part achieved through treaty making, where parties work together to find solutions, create plans for development and control processes. Besides states functional together, individuals can influence its process by creating needs, address problems and inform.The modern means of communication have increased the connectivity between social club and those in power as international integration is increasing on all levels. Some multilateral treaties establish an international organization that is concerned with the provisions the treaty entails. The united Nations The most know international organization, made up of states, is the unite Nations(UN). It was established via the UN postulate, a multilateral treaty, stating its goals, procedures, means and measures and much more on how all participants were to act. It started with 51 member states and it has 1 93 nowadays.The UN is an organization that reaches all over the globe and it is likely for every member to address a problem during certain occasions(Scott,2008). The UN is as it were an umbrella organization, it established umpteen others to carry out what was concord upon in the UN charter. The UN has so many organizations that it practically is involved all over the world with all kinds of problems on economical, social and fight matters(Scott, 2008). The UN charter is made of some(prenominal) articles, divided in chapters, paragraphs and subparagraphs. It is an immense agreement on how states should interact, develop, succor and much more.The first article states the UNs main purpose on which it was founded after cosmea War II. Article 1 The Purposes of the coupled Nations are 1. To maintain international quiet and warranter, and to that end to take stiff corporate measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the two-eyed violet, and for the suppression of acts of trespass or other exposees of the mollification, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in abidance with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or lenifyment of international disputes or situations which baron lead to a breach of the peace . To develop friendly relations among nations found on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of destinys, and to take other remove measures to strengthen universal peace 3. To achieve international co-operation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encourage respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or righteousness and 4. To be a centre for disparageonizing the actions of nations in the attainment of these common ends. (UN, 1945) world(prenominal) peace and security, global peace and security, a global purpose which states that all members should attend to solve and prevent problems as peacefully as possible. By signing the UN Charter a state will become part of an extensive network of rules and procedures which it has to embrace, which have been determined by them and others. The UN has increased its influence repayable to the asylum of an environment for treaty making. everyplace time the UN has become the worlds most important organization for international integration by motivating states to solve problems.Its power has be justified by its members and the agreements between them (Schooyans, 2001). The major organs of the UN are the security Council, the internationalistic Court of Justice, the Economical and Social Council and the planetary Assembly. For finding an make to my question the focus will be on the warrantor Council. The tribute Council is an organ that is most known due to the measures it can take. It is made up out of 5 indissoluble members and 10 non permanent members which will be selected by the General Assembly. Its permanent members are China, The get together Kingdom, The regular army, France and Russia.In chapter V of the Charter articles are specify to state its purpose. Article 24 1. In order to ensure prompt and effective action by the United Nations, its Members shoot the breeze on the surety Council direct state for the maintenance of international peace and security, and agree that in carrying out its duties under(a) this province the security measures Council acts on their behalf. (UN, 1945). All members should sustain the credentials Council informed, an obligation to make sure the UN can act if this is required.The five permanent members have a prevent right, meaning they can dismiss certain decisions even when they are urgent, generally accepted and bulk voted. According to article 42 and 43 of the UN charter the warrantor Council is able to action measures as economical and political exclusion, named sanctions. If no positive result follows, then it is allowed to use article 43 stating it may take such action by air, sea, or land forces as may be necessary to maintain or relate international peace and security.Such action may include demonstrations, blockade, and other operations by air, sea, or land forces of Members of the United Nations. (UN, 1945). Whenever the certification Council comes to an agreement about what measures should be interpreted it presents a fortitude, a formal statement, extensively describing what is to come, how it is to come and who should be involved. A resolution could form the basis for a soldiery preventive. A problem that needs attention, check to the Security Council is (article 39).. any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression (UN, 1945).The Security council has presented sextuple resolutions with regards to an act of aggression such as resolution 83 and 84, 1950, to use force to repel the armed attack upon the country of Korea by for ces of North Korea. (Scott,2010, p. 103). The use of force has been authorized through more resolutions regarding, Kuwait, Somalia and Sudan. tone back at the main question, it might be tempting to say that an organ, with multiple members, working for a safe and touch on world is a definite yes. International integration has reached a point where there is a collective choice.A democratically (up boulder clay the veto) determined procedure that takes into account agreed norms and values by just about all states. The vision was formed by 51 founding members and today the charter is approximately universal. When a decision to interfere, to use force, to assort sovereignty, to ensure safety and security is made it becomes clear that this world is so interconnected, that it lets an organization descend over life and death. Determining if the use of force is necessary, is not only led by the Security Council, it is allowed to ask help and advice to reach a conclusion.Many internatio nal organizations get track of human rights and they are eagre to alarm the security council to act, with sanctions or force, when they think something needs to be changed. Their expertise and resources make them trustworthy, not only for the Security Council but also for the world population. The increasing interconnection of the world makes it possible for these organizations to counterpane their worries and claims faster than ever before due to technological innovations as the internet, smart phones and global beam channels.International integration benefits from these technological innovations as problems become more visible and are spread faster. Communication and cooperation between organizations and states can lead to fast decisions and less damage to those under threat. International interventions, canonical by the Security council, have increased in be since the windup of the cold war. The 1990s can be appointed as the decade where most international interventions t ook place. It is also in this halt that the idea of diplomacy over the use of force blurred.The use of force, force interventions, became a short term solution that would end the suffering of those suppressed. With regards to the twentieth century Afghanistan and Iraq are the most violent interventions so far. aft(prenominal) the 9/11 terrorist attack in vernal-York, the USA promoted and executed the war on terror. This replaced the idea behind interventions for humanitarian and conflict reasons to a new enemy international terrorism and its supporting regimes. The use of madness became a tool to s dole out off the opponent as well as completely deactivating him.Inner state conflicts that have been turn to increasingly over the past two decades are a relative new symptom for the UN and its Security Council. Shifting from conflicts between states to a state in conflict with itself. The traditional rules for peace keeping did not apply for these kinds of conflicts(Zandee, 2012). International integration reaches to the very integrity of states, as seen with the use of resolutions. non only in cooperative ways, but also in the form of interventions authorize through cooperation between states.The link between globalization and the UN is in its cooperative character, where the United Nations provides a ground for discussion, problem solving, initiatives and the creation of rules. The UN promotes development on different levels and multiple fields and it is to be reached through cooperation between its members (Bertucci & Alberti, 2001). In the year 2000 the UN millenary Summit was held for the purpose of the discussion and adaptation of the UN millennium Declaration. Over 150 world eaders lastly adopted the declaration, agreeing on the goals it set out to achieve for the upcoming 15 years such as less poverty, better health care and non-violence. Important was the furiousness on better and more efficient cooperation between its members, an increase of international integration. iodin of the main points made was to make globalization a positive force for all worlds people (Sneyd, 2005). Syria Syria is a state in the middle east neighboring Jordan, Israel, Turkey, Lebanon and Iraq. Its main source of income is the oil- and gas industry and a small sector of tourism can be found at the Mediterranean sea.Syria has had several(prenominal) conflicts over time regarding grease with its neighboring states (Donker & Janssen, 2011). Syrias recent history has been used as one of the many motives for the fends that arose in the spring of 2011. In 1967 the Syrian political party Baath took power by a coupe, overthrowing the government. After this, in 1970, the Baathist Hafez al-Assad took power in his own hands via a second coupe. He used his array connections, as he fought in many sections, too establish a trustworthy security force. Hafez al-Assad appointed many relatives and friends to several high political and military functi ons.In the initiation he was not very universal as he originated from a relatively small confederation of Alawi. Syria houses a cast of subcultures and religious sects and multiple conflicts between them have passed over time. Yet, the majority of Syria supported him for manner of speaking stability to the economy and its inhabitants. This changed over time as Hafez al-Assads regime became more bossy and the economy started to fail. In the 1970s uprisings begun, which became more and more violent under the leadership of the Islamic Brotherhood.An example is its sniper campaign targeting the governments representatives. Many inhabitants did not support this way of protesting and the increasing cognizance of the Brotherhoods intentions gave way for Hafez al-Assad to act brutally in 1982. This was the final standoff between the Islamists and the regime and it took place in Hama. An estimated number of culturedian causalities varies between 5000 to 20000. Hafez al-Assads ruler ship was based on fear and showed revolting consequences for those laborious to reverse it. The media was state controlled and salve is in present day (Donker & Janssen, 2011).To gain stability after the uprisings Hafez al-Assad assigned more political positions to other sub baseing members of Syria. In chemical reaction to the Brotherhood, any political form of Islam was strictly forbidden. During the late 1980s and 1990s Syria underwent, as many other states due to ending of the cold war, economic liberation. Policies developed in reality improved the position of political elites who had the resources to engage in exclusive economic deals. The strain between state, now seen as corrupt, and its society grew. In July 2000 Bashar al-Assad succeeded his father and he has been the leader of Syria ever since.His attitude and means concerned with ruling Syria do not quit that much from his father societys voice and administration are s cashbox not consistent as a small s ort out owns most of the states power as well as economical and military resources. Bashar al-Assads nationalism, clientelism and severe repression held up over the years until surround 2011 (Donker & Janssen, 2011). On March 6, 2011, children that were not older than 15 wrote the text the people motive the fall of the regime (in Syrian) in the Confederate city Daraa. The children were arrested and tortured by Syrian security forces.Protests arose in response to this incident, first locally, but it did not take long for the remaining Syrians to participate in across the nation demonstrations. At first uprisings were generally peaceful, as people remembered what happened under his fathers ruler ship. Yet, over time certain protest groups became more violent and separated themselves from the mainstream, but still recalling its support (Donker & Janssen, 2011). Videos posted on YouTube of the arrests spread a wide timbre of anger, among citizens, but also internationally (Ti mes, 2011).Anti governmental movements have been suppressed to underground spheres under the ruler ship of the al-Assads and its police state. Yet, there was an opening for coming out now. dungeon for protests and coordinated uprisings were now present and several movements tried to gather as much people as possible. Thus, it happened several times that the government controlled media was manipulated to prevent protest onward motion as when mobile phone networks were closing as well as many websites (Zoepf, 2011).The so-called Arab Spring started at the end of declination 2010 as a series of protests and demonstrations across several North African and center of attention Eastern states, such as in Libya, Egypt, Lebanon, Tunisia and also in March 2011 in Syria (Schippers, 2011). The Arab Spring was mostly led by the voices of youngsters concerned with their next. The feeling of repression, unemployment, depravity and undersized democratic value triggered many to protest again st their current leaders and governments. Many other states were showing symptoms of breaking regimes, motivating Syrians to relate to fight for their cause (Schippers, 2011).The peaceful protests gave way for more violent ones once the government started to repress them with violence. Heavy military resources were used to break up demonstrations as well as targeted assaults on protest group leaders (Schippers, 2011). More and more, images, videos and reports came from Syria and were spread all over the world. The cruel acts of armed government forces towards accomplishedians were portrayed as terroristic, suppressive, inhumane and in violation with international laws (Khalay, 2011). As in other Spring states, governments were not going to settle easy.Violence was commonly used in Egypt and the elevation example is Libya where the protests led to a polished war between government and several protest groups. The killing of noncombatants by a central, repression based government was described as a crime and the international union was to be involved soon (Khalay, 2011). absolution International is an international organization concerned with human rights. It is mayor player in international integration, as its reports trigger discussion, make change and picture current developments.During the Arab Spring, oblivion International has been highly concerned with the treatment of civilians. Reports about Syria indicate serious human rights violations and the organization is alarming the international community to act to diaphragm these practices. Violent attacks harm civilians and there is a lack of primary resources and security. It is a situation that needs to be changed and it needs to be changed fast as these gross violations lead to more causalities every day (Khamis, 2012). International intervention returns to the picture.Up till recent day the inner state conflict Syria is dealing with, is still not resolved. Thousands of deaths are tomfooling an ongoing civil war which seems not to end on a short notice as the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad still enjoys military support(although some soldiers turned over) as well as scarce, stock-still important macrocosm support. The international community, with the UN as main player, has alarm the Syrian government to cop its activities and has employ multiple sanctions to pressure its movement and resources such as oil export restrictions (Iadtu, 2011).The security council has been involved since the beginning of the cruel acting of the armed government forces. The Arab Spring has been interpreted as a period of humanitarian crimes, where old repressive regimes are tried to be destroyed (Iadtu, 2011). The Security Council approved a military intervention in Libya, shelling governmental buildings, weapons depots and providing resources and manpower to the democratic impedance. The bombings were made till the extent that they destroyed most of Libyas military force used for repr ession.Thus, the join of civilian, unintended, casualties were high. The creation of an integrated democratic governmental structure has shown some progress, but the latest report indicates new instability as power protest groups now claims power and use force to gain this (Nazemroaya, 2012). The Security Council has send negotiators, as Kofi Annan, to Syria to discuss possible diplomatic solutions to end the conflict. Yet, Bashar al-Assad does not expect to comply. Its government is also stating that it is fighting terrorist groups and not the entire population of Syria.He refers to groups of protestors that are well armed and are targeting the Syrian government. It accuses the USA and other westsideern countries of supplying the opposition with resources to take out the government. In response to this acquisition the Western society claims the protestors need to defend themselves from ongoing governmental attacks (Cunningham, 2012). The Security Council has suggested a similar intervention as in Libya, thus Russia and China stood in the way as they vetoed this proposal.Russia has been internationally criticized for the ongoing weapon supply to the Syrian government. affair helicopters have been shipped several times and the USA is the main opponent of this practice as it implies Russia is supporting the al-Assad regime and therefore grace it means on how to settle the conflict. Russia says it is not violating any international laws and that it is providing the helicopters for protection and not for attack (Lathd, 2012) Russia is Syrias biggest arm supplier, it houses the only Russian naval base in the Mediterranean Sea.Syria has quite some Russian inhabitants and the Russian Orthodox church is influential regarding certain accommodations and populations in Syria (Carr, 2012). Besides these interests, other factors play a big role. Russia played its veto card with the statement that it does not want to see a Libya scenario again. That includes many civil ian victims, the rise of radical Islamism and a lot of costs (Carr, 2012). It is stopping the Security Council from pickings action in the form of an military intervention.It can also be taken in consideration that Putin faced some severe resistance when he reassigned himself as president and its resulting protests. reinforcement another military intervention might give Putin onward as a person involuntary to participate in overthrowing repression led governments, as Russia might be labeled as such with suspicious democratic regulations (Lathd, 2012). The Security Council has not been able to stop the conflict, merely its sanctions are felt more every day. But also these means of conflict suppression are not only inflicting al-Assads government, large parts of the population are facing below average standards of living.Russia also shares the opinion that Western states are providing resources to destroy the regime (Cunningham, 2012). Cunningham(2012) and Nazemroaya(2012) argue that international interventions are a tool of Western imperialism, modern colonialism. The power of the Security Council and its main members has freehanded towards a way to change states in such a way that the West will benefit from it, such as open economies ready for more foreign investments. The Western media plays a significant role in portraying situation as cruel and is good at move the populations emotions and opinions.It tries to justify their actions by showing images of killed children, plot of land negative reporting about NATO bombing and the resulted civilian deaths are hard to find. Once violence has started it is important to supply the opponent, in this case the protestors, with arms, so it can be said that the government, when shooting with sharp, is harming civilians. It is important that the media will justify the intervention with help from international organizations such as Amnesty International. The duty 2 Protect has been used under the headline humanita rianism to execute violent operations as seen in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya.The Security Council, and the UN, have enormous international powers and are able to root over death and life. The hegemon plays an important in addressing and executing issues and missions. Much military interventions have led to the destruction of regimes and set boundaries for future development. Syrians are pessimistic about a foreign intervention as some of them still support al-Assad. It is unlikely that Russia will set for a new stress soon, leaving the situation of ongoing civil war to continue (Cunningham, 2012) (Nazemroaya, 2012).Up till present day no military intervention has been undertaken. Constant overturn about the use of such a mean slows the power to act and protect down. Syria is under international interest, but the international community has not yet found a way to act and stop the violence. The conflict in Syria provides a better look at the problems international integration is fa cing when debate and veto votes lead to a stop in developing solutions for conflict. The democratic diorama leads to a proper justification of the Security Councils decisions, but it turns against him when there is no cohesion.The consequences are severe, as Syria remains in a civil conflict. Conclusion The answer to the main question revolves around the process of globalization, the United Nations and the current conflict in Syria. International integration has generated an interconnected world, in where more is known then ever before and where states are generating cooperation. The change in communication resources has led to a network of intelligence where one can find and bring on almost everything. Accessibility, fluidity and transparency mark modern times.The United Nations is a hot flash example of international integration and it will continue to be. Its goals, declarations, treaties and resolutions illustrate the worldwide need for international integration and its furth er development. The UNs power has increased over time and the Security Council is one of the most profound organs to achieve its goals. The validity of the resolutions is determined by the permanent members, powerful actors in the world with more influence than other states. fib illustrates interventions as successful means to stop violent conflicts and generate peace.Thus, this should be claimed with care as the current conflict in Syria is not benefitting from international integration. The empire steers the interests of the UN, yet others are able to influence its goals. As the USA is a superior military-, economical- and political power in the world, its influence has great consequence for international integration. World peace is one of the main goals of the United Nations and the integration of states worldwide has set out several positives achievements. Is international integration an advantage or disadvantage for world peace?The United Nations motivate international integra tion and its goals are clear. It wants to distribute wealth, create common interests of concern and stop violent conflicts. If international integration was less intense than it is nowadays, the legality of actions by states would be less, possibly provoking new conflicts. The democratic procedures justify the UNs actions and consensus is properly reached. Yet, as the Syria case has shown, it also slows down the process of acting. Overall I would like to answer the question with an advantage.Cooperation leads to efficient usage of resources as knowledge, money and weapons. It also integrates multiple interests and reflects opinions. The experience of the UNs goals creates a justifications for its actions and therefore prevents further conflict. If ( almost ) universal goals and means are approved, acting for the sake of world peace will be accepted faster. Bibliography Bertucci, G. , & Alberti, A. (2001). Globalization and the Role of the State Challenges and Perspectives. New Y ork United Nations. Carr, B. (2012, June 25). Syrian Solution Lies in Putins Hands.The Australian , p. 7. Cunningham, F. (2012). how the Arab League Has Become a weapon of Western Imperialism. Global Research. Donker, T. H. , & Janssen, F. (2011). Supporting the Syrian Summer Dynamics of the uprising and Considerations for International Engagement. The Hague Clingendael Institute. Fincle, P. , & Govale, E. (2012, February 10). Globalisation. Retrieved July 1, 2012, from BBC Bitesize http//www. bbc. co. uk/schools/gcsebitesize/geography/globalisation Giddens, A. (2000). Runaway World How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives. capital of the United Kingdom Routeledge Taylor and Francis.Goldstein, J. , & Pevehouse, J. (2011). International Relations. capital of the United Kingdom Pearson. Iadicola, P. (2008). Globalization and Empire. International Journal of Social head , 3-36. Iadtu, S. (2011, August 18). Can western sanctions touch Bashar al-Assad? Guardian Comment Networ k . Jeffery, S. (2002, October 21). What is globalisation? Retrieved July 1, 2012, from The Guardian http//www. guardian. co. uk/world/2002/oct/31/globalisation. simonjeffery Khalay, D. (2011, October 24). capital of Syria may have to revise its political mindset. BBC Monitoring Middle East , p. 10.Khamis, N. (2012, July 2). historical arms trade negotiations a pass off to prevent future Syrian-style slaughter. Amnesty International Annual Report . Lathd, S. (2012). Russias veto on Syria resolution sign or changing world order. BBC Worldwide Monitoring. Lombaerde, P. d. , & Iapadre, P. L. (2007). International Integration and Societal Progress A Critical Review of Globalisation Indicators. genus Paris OECD. Maier, C. (2005). An American Empire? The Problems of Frontiers and Peace in Twenty-First Century Politics. In L. C. Young, The New American Empire (pp. 9-11).New-York The New Press. Nazemroaya, M. D. (2012). From the refrigerated War to NATOs Humanitarian Wars The Compl icity of the United Nations. Global Research. Schippers, H. (2011, July). Op eigen kracht taai verzet van Syrische oppositie. Internationale Spectator , pp. 401-404. Schooyans, M. (2001). The United Nations and Globalization. Louvain Louvain University. Scott, S. V. (2010). International Law in World Politics. London Lynne Rienner Publishers. Shaw, M. N. (2008). International Law. Cambridge Cambridge University Press. Sneyd, A. (2005). UN Millennium Summit.Hamilton McMaster University. Times, T. N. (2011, March 19). In Syria, Crackdown After Protests. The New York Times , p. 10. UN. (1945). UN Charter. San Fransisco UN. Zandee, D. (2012, April). International Interventies Lessons learned. Retrieved June 28, 2012, from www. clingendeal. nl http//www. clingendael. nl/search/results. html? term= beam+Zandee&start=1&division_id=&target=author Zoepf, K. (2011, April 28). huge Repressed in Syria, an Internal antagonist Takes Shape. The New York Times , p. 12. &8212&8212&8212&8 212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212&8212 1 .Transnational corporations, also called multinational corporations, are corporations operating in multiple states all over the world. An example is McDonalds, with restaurants in more than 100 countries 2 . Sovereignty is seen as a concept of a state being commutative from other states influences. It entails that a certain grunge that belongs to a state should not be interfered by another state so that it is free to make its own choices, create laws and determine a governmental form. 3 . In this context the word regime refers to states that are lead by dictators, corruption and unjustified government violence.