Sunday, January 27, 2019
Energy Conversation States
TMA03 Covering Block 3  interrogative 1 (a)An impactor  mound of 45 kg is  apply to represent the weight of child  reasonably regarded to be  gnarly in an accident with glass or plastics. (b)The BS standards  fades the manufacturers a clear set of standards that their products need to achieve to be  upright and fit for the purpose that they  incur been designed for. It also  passs the purchaser the  prognosis that the item has r all(prenominal)ed the standards set down by the BSI and will be a safe for the expected life of the item. (c) (i)The  expertness on impact is   guess by using the following  comparisonsPotential Energy (PE) = mass x gravity x  top This gives the potential  skill at the  upside when the  thumping is held at the start of the test. This  send word be used as a check to for the Kinetic energy (KE) equation as the  virtue of energy conversation states that energy whitethorn neither be created nor destroyed.  wherefore the sum of all the energies in the  form is a    constant. So the PE when the ball is held at height will be the same as the KE  skillful before the impact with the glass. To calculate the KE use the equation KE = ? mv2 (ii) Using the KE equation from question (i)KE = ? mv2 u = initial  pep pill  v = final velocity  a = acceleration  s = distance   hold in the constants of Mass = 45kg To calculate the v2 using the equation v2 = u2 + 2 x a x s For test 1 KE = ? mv2 For the v2 v2 = 02 + 2 x 9. 8 x 305 Gives 5978  recruit in to KE = ? mv2 to give KE = ? x 45 x 5978 To give 134505 = 135J to 3 sf To check use PE = mgh 45 x 9. 8 x 305 = 134505  corpulent up to 3 sf to give 135 J So PE =KE 135J is as given in BS 62061981. For test 2KE = ? mv2 For the v2 v2 = 02 + 2 x 9. 8 x 457 Gives 8957. 2 Insert in to KE = ? mv2 to give KE = ? x 45 x 8957. 2 To give 201537 = 202J to 3 sf To check use PE = mgh 45 x 9. 8 x 457 = 201537 Round up to 3 sf to give 202 J So PE =KE 202J is as given in BS 62061981. For  attempt 3 KE = ? mv2 For the v2 v2 = 02    + 2 x 9. 8 x 1219 Gives 23892. 4 Insert in to KE = ? mv2 to give KE = ? x 45 x 23892. 4 To give 537579 = 538J to 3 sf To check use PE = mgh 45 x 9. 8 x 1219 = 537579 Round up to 3 sf to give 538 J So PE =KE 538J is as given in BS 62061981 iii) The velocity that the impactor strikes the glass when it is dropped from a height of 1219 mm is calculated as above using v2 = u2 + 2 x a x s v2 = 02 + 2 x 9. 8 x 1219 = 23892. 4 v = (23892. 4= 154. 6 m s-1  chief 2 (a)There  are 3 main features of an invention to make it patentable. It has to have something  cutting about it this could be an improvement on an existing item. Also it  must(prenominal) have a purpose (useful) and be able to be  make but this is  non as important with todays technologies as a software program can be patented. b) (i) The advantages of using a hollow shape for lintels are that a solid lintel is both heavy and cumbersome when it is in transit and when being manoeuvred into position at the build site. The added weigh   t of the lintel will also require the   march on wall to be at a required strength to  condescend the lintel and the load above it. They can be considered that they can be over designed for the job that they are intended for. It is possible to  transplant  veridical from a beam without compromising its strength, as the material  outside will be from areas that the stress is negligibly small is not a  liberal volume.The stiffness of the beam will depend upon the properties of the material used in its construction and the component geometry of the design of the beam. (ii) In the Dorman Long patent the suggested material of construction  carapace/sheet  nerve. The use of plate/sheet steel is favoured due to its stiffness compared to its weight and that it can be easily folded or rolled in the construction of the lintel. (c) (i) Refer back to claim 1 of the Catnic patent as discussed in Block 3  bulge out 2.List the  substantive integers of the Catnic lintel, and identify which componen   t  recrudesce is absent from the Dorman Long patent. a  graduation exercise horizontal plate or  give way adapted to  condense a course or plurality of superimposed units forming part of the inner  contend and a  bit horizontal plate or part  comfortably parallel to the  archetypical and spaced there from in a  downward vertical direction and adapted to span the  nether region in the  pitfall wall and be  liveed at least at  each(prenominal) end thereof upon courses forming parts of the outer and inner skins respectively of the cavity wall  abutting an a perture, and first rigid inclined support member extending downwardly and forwardly from or near the front edge adjacent the cavity of the first horizontal plate or part and forming with the second plate or part at an intermediate position which lies  among the front and rear edge of the second plate or part and adapted to extend across the cavity, and a second rigid support member extending vertically from or from near the rear edg   e of the first horizontal plate or part to join with the second plate or part adjacent its rear edge. ii) The supporting member  mingled with the two Suggest what effect the extra part is likely to have on the performance of the Catnic lintel compared to the Dorman Long lintel. (6 + 2 = 8 marks) Question 3 a) Although in a perfect surround there would be no  stake to  whatever persons or property and to remove any risk would mean stopping the processes that give rise to risk. However that is not the case so there will always risk involved in everything that we carry out.I have widely based this answer on the nuclear power industry where the risks involved are both   delightful and  slight acceptable. Risk more acceptable   No  alternatives available This could be classed as the use of a radio active fuel in a nuclear power   station.The risk of its use would be classed as acceptable as there is not  a suitable alternative as a fuel.  Risk known with certainty The use of a radio acti   ve fuel and its risks are known with certainty and   should be factored in to the design and management of the facility.  Risk less acceptable   erect delayed Prolonged  characterisation to a radio active  piece will have a delayed effect   dependant upon the duration and magnitude of the  photograph. So if these   exposures are not monitored and controlled the risk would be less   acceptable.  Consequences irreversible Again as the damage done from high, prolonged exposure to a radio active   element to the human body can be irreversible.Also a spillage or   accidental release to the environment could lead to the area being of no use  to the local  creation for a considerable time.  b) The principle of ALARP where improvements to the systems or process to reduce the risks are shown to be greater than the  be in the production compared to the benefits gained. The extra  woos may be balanced against the risk reduction, for example, reducing the risk of exposure to the environment and    humanity from hazardous chemicals or ionising radiation.The ALARP assessment in  common fig tree 3 shows that the acceptable risk for electrical control systems has been broken in to 3 defined harm categories. The inverted triangles show that as the  absolute frequency of those injured rises  so the risk becomes less tolerable. The area shaded broadly acceptable shows that the processes carried out do not pose a risk to those involved, risk is negligible and it will be necessary to maintain checks and safety futures to keep the injuries at this level.In the area marked tolerable if ALARP shows the area that the risk of  distress to those involved in the process ahs increased, if the risk was under taken then there could be a benefit. This can be broken into 2 further subsections, if the frequency is low the it can be tolerable if the cost of the risk reduction exceeds the improvement, as the frequency increases then it would only be tolerable if the risk reduction is impractical or    the cost  disproportional to the gains in improvement.The area shaded intolerable is the area where the frequency is at it highest and  and so the risk cannot be justified unless in exceptionable circumstances, for example  operative on a live high voltage electrical system. Question 4 Table 4. 4 in Block 3 Part 4 shows the various stages in energy conversion for fuel used to power a computer. It shows a hypothetical balance sheet for energy conversion from chemical energy (in a fuel) to light energy (light emitted by a computer display). a) The law of energy conversation states that energy may neither be created nor destroyed but transformed into different forms of energy i. . to heat, light, or noise energy. Therefore the sum of all the energies in the system is a constant. Explain briefly the principle of the conservation of energy, and how it applies at each stage in the energy conversion process. (2 marks) (b) Calculate the percentage of the  centre available energy that is co   nverted to (a) heat (b) noise (c) electrical energy. In each case, show your working fully. (4 + 4 + 4 = 12 marks)   devote into three parts energy required for ice to reach a temp of 0 q1 = mcT q1 = 11. 75 g(2. 09 J/gC)(-5. 00C-0C) q1 = -122. 8J second part nergy required for change of states from solid to  suave q2 = n*? Hfus n = 11. 75g / 18. 02g/ breakwater n = 0. 65mol q2 = 0. 65mol * 6. 02 kJ/mol q2 = 4. 0kJ careful units q2 = 4000J third part.. energy required for liquid water from 0 to 0. 500C q3 = mcT q3 = 11. 75 g(4. 21 J/gC)(0. 500  0) q3 = 24. 7J ENERGY IN TOTAL E = q1 + q2 + q3 E = -122. 8J + 4000J + 24. 7J E = 3902J The final 10 marks for the assignment are awarded for  demo  see the guidance in the introduction to this booklet. These will be scored on the PT3 form as Question 5. Assignment Booklet  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.