'Myth History - McNeil and Zinn'

'Question 1.\n wherefore does McNeil prefer/ defend the term fiction bill to level?\n\n reception\nHi stratum is an account of the past, whereas romance is a in all probability story. Myt account statement, then, is a story of the past looking to have currency. A annals is write to inform kinfolk of what happened, and a legend is recycled to develop the moment of what happened.\nMyth and history atomic number 18 identical in modal values, as both explain how things got to be the way they are by telling somewhat sort of story. exactly our common idiom reckons invention to be false succession history is, or aspires to be, neat. Accordingly, a historiographer who rejects some superstar elses conclusions calls them mythical, musical composition claiming that his receive views are original. But what seems true to one historian will seem false to an new(prenominal), so one historians lawfulness becomes anothers myth. (Course Kit, pg 75)\nThis picking and choosing of facts is what makes history elastic and evolutionary. any close has its own version of right; accuracy almost its own culture as good as the truth  about other cultures. Truth to one is another persons myth (mythistories). Therefore, all these outdoor(a) forces of culture, background, relationships, society, etcetera, affect what is true whether the individual realizes it or not.\nMcNeills essay, Mythistory, or Truth, Myth, score, and Historians,  emphasizes the falsification of historical truth, seeing history as evolving through the uncovering of new info and exposure to gifted choices and subjective judgments on the arrangement of historical facts. These judgments and choices have nought to do with scientific methodology.\nMcNeill believes all the certainty  becomes nothing unless a account; it has to be dedicate together for the commentator in bless to be understandable, credible, and profitable because facts alone do not puddle meaning or inte lligibility to the record of the past. History (or myth) becomes self-validating.\n\n2.\nWhat are his views on the functions of myth?\n\nResponse\nMyths are ordinary st... '