Ethics

1 . The five models of normative ethical theories discussed include the pursuit from (Quinn , 2009 , Post , 2004 . In parenthesis , I have listed the confession or standard for an action (X ) under the hypothesisdivine command assumption (God said do Xact utilitarianism (X will increase happinessrule utilitarianism (performing acts like X routinely in these circumstances would be expected to assert the general happinesssocial contract possibility (X will not let on the rights of myself or othersKantianism (X does not treat people as a means to an end , and even if society adjusted to everyone choosing X in this circumstance , X would remain a operable choice2 . The important difference between utilizing social contract possibility and Kantianism for ethical decision-making is that social-contract conjecture is concerne d with rights , while Kantianism is concerned with debt tool and making sure the decision remains viable for others to bulls eye in the time to come .

In social contract theory , decision-making involves determining what set of rights everyone can have without interfering with unfeigned rights of greater importance . Thereafter we just have to permit whether a proposed action would violate any of the existing rights . The upset is considering ahead of time what rights everyone can have that will not conflict with one another and anticipating any exceptions In Kantianism , we whirl out the idea of right s and consider whether our performing the ac! tion would tightlipped that potential drop decision off to others in the future . In contemporary language , we might say that Kantianism is sustainable decision-making ReferencesPOST...If you want to relieve oneself a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper